Of such terrorist ads I have read a lot in recent months. The approach of the fateful date of December 21 2012 has often triggered the most frightening fantasies and uncontrolled. Every rock, meteorite and comet moving in space in turn have been pointed out as mortal threats. But this time seems a little 'different.
First, because to spread the alarm was the site of British journalism ITN taken from the online CNN (The largest group of worldwide information). Second, because in spreading this news to say the least chilling sources are cited as "secret informants" of NASA. Employees of the U.S. space that - anonymously - would break the delivery of silence imposed from the top of the Agency not to create panic among the population.
According to the leaked data, the asteroid would have huge size, since it is estimated as large as the state of Texas. High the risk of collision. Adding to the concern, then, the nickname given to this monster of space: as it happens, Nibiru, the mysterious planet as quoted by the Sumerian texts, harbinger - at every passage - of disasters.
If we consider, then, that NASA has not confirmed - of course - but neither denied - oddly enough - the news, there really is to stay calm. In this framework, it adds a significant detail: the page containing the news published by ITN News, the 17.35 5 of November, has disappeared. The only image is still visible "Photographed" and posted on CNN.
In part of the article read, then, appears the name of one NASA scientist - Newark Rob Murray - and an excerpt of the interview. "I think it's a little too early to say that there will be the end of the world. There is only a 10 percent chance that an impact occurs. But we must also remember what would happen if an asteroid hit us. Would not it be like if the Earth ... "From this point on, the article is cut.
A quick web search did not match any documents about the name "Rob Murray Newark". But there is a Robert Murray in the credits of some links published on the official site of the American space. The author has it wrong in writing the name of the interviewee? Or the respondent simply does not exist? There are two possible hypotheses: a sensational cover-up work, or (hopefully) a colossal hoax. [Sabrina Pieragostini su Extremamente].